A. The Data
The data in this study were analyzed by using quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data were taken from the students’ writing scores, while qualitative data were taken from the diary notes, observation sheets, questionnaire sheet, and interview. The data had been gathered within two cycles. The research was conducted in a class of X, SMA Negeri 21 Medan which consisted of 40 students.
Since the students’ achievement was not significantly improved in cycle I, it was needed to conduct cycle II. Cycle I consisted in four meetings while cycle II consisted in three meetings. So, there were seven meetings in this research.
1. The Quantitative Data
The quantitative data were taken from the result of writing tasks during the research conducted. By applying peer review in the process of writing, the students’ scores showed improvement continuously. The students’ scores can be seen in the following table:
Table 4.1 Students’ Writing Scores of Orientation test, Cycle I and Cycle II
No. | Students’ Initials | Orientation Test Score | Cycle I Score | Cycle II Score |
1. | AJ | 71 | 85 | 91 |
2. | AP | 71 | 83 | 92 |
3. | AYP | 42 | 62 | 73 |
4. | CCP | 67 | 72 | 79 |
5. | DAR | 69 | 80 | 89 |
6. | DSAP | 34 | 52 | 71 |
7. | DRSP | 71 | 84 | 92 |
8. | EERS | 68 | 75 | 84 |
9. | ESRS | 70 | 82 | 88 |
10. | ERS | 67 | 76 | 85 |
11. | FG | 45 | 63 | 72 |
12. | GS | 72 | 85 | 90 |
13. | GTNS | 68 | 74 | 87 |
14. | HAA | 38 | 57 | 68 |
15. | HN | 57 | 72 | 84 |
16. | HS | 47 | 63 | 71 |
17. | HA | 55 | 67 | 74 |
18. | IDU | 68 | 86 | 90 |
19. | IDHS | 63 | 73 | 76 |
20. | JP | 34 | 57 | 64 |
21. | JNM | 53 | 65 | 71 |
22. | JPT | 44 | 65 | 73 |
23. | JMS | 53 | 66 | 72 |
24. | KAPR | 72 | 87 | 91 |
25. | LG | 43 | 64 | 74 |
26. | LA | 70 | 84 | 87 |
27. | MKZH | 62 | 71 | 79 |
28. | MYR | 56 | 67 | 74 |
29. | MM | 64 | 76 | 83 |
30. | MSS | 67 | 83 | 89 |
31. | MAA | 81 | 90 | 94 |
32. | NSRT | 59 | 76 | 86 |
33. | NDA | 61 | 75 | 86 |
34. | PN | 69 | 76 | 85 |
35. | RH | 74 | 89 | 93 |
36. | RS | 47 | 62 | 71 |
37. | SNM | 71 | 82 | 91 |
38. | SMESH | 43 | 68 | 73 |
39. | SMM | 67 | 87 | 91 |
40. | YP | 55 | 71 | 76 |
∑X | 2388 | 2952 | 3259 | |
X | 59.7 | 73.8 | 81.4 |
2. The Qualitative Data
The qualitative data were taken from observation sheets, questionnaire sheet, diary notes and interview.
a. Observation sheet
Observation sheets were used to record the situation and the problems found during the process of teaching and learning recount text through peer review technique. Observation sheet was filled by the English teacher as the collaborator/observer.
b. Questionnaire sheet
Questionnaire sheet was distributed in the last meeting of cycle II. It was used to know the students’ opinion about the application of peer review technique in learning recount texts and in the process of writing recount texts. The questionnaire consisted fifteeen statements and it was made up based on liket scale, they are strongly agree (3), agree (2), and disagree (1).
c. Diary notes
The diary notes were analyzed in order to know all the progression achieved in teaching and learning recount text through peer review technique. It contained the writer’s personal evaluation of the running class. It was found that students’ learning process in writing recount text through peer review technique improved from cycle I to cycle II.
Saya ingin berbagi pengalaman saya mendapatkan persetujuan pinjaman dari perusahaan pinjaman Tn. Pedro, yang mana pengajuan pinjaman saya ditolak oleh bank karena kredit saya buruk. Namun Pedro memberi saya pinjaman dengan bunga 3%, sebesar 7 juta dolar AS. Saya akan mendorong orang lain yang mencari pinjaman untuk menghubungi kantor pinjaman Pedro melalui email di pedroloanss@gmail.com atau WhatsApp di +393510140339.
BalasHapus